Visit Tom Bombadil's column >>

TOM BOMBADIL

A merry fellow, quick with a song, captain of the table
Add To Watchlist
Articles Posted: 101; Links Seeded: 489
Member Since: 4/2007Last Seen: 8/09/2009

Extremely Disturbing: A Pedophile Boasts and Blogs

advertisement

From MSNBC and Newsweek ...

Is there such a thing as a lawful pedophile? Parents and children's advocates in the Los Angeles area have grown worried about Jack McClellan, a self-described pedophile who in recent months has maintained an on-again, off-again Web page where he charts his trips to family-friendly venues like parks, county fairs and bowling alleys to meet what he calls LGs—little girls. McClellan tells reporters that he gets a "high" from being around girls between 3 to 11 years old, but insists he does not molest them.

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
8.6
{"commentId":915472,"authorDomain":"tombombadil"}

Have we lost all common sense as a nation? Any law that "protects" scum such as McClellen is being misapplied. He is a danger and one single child hurt, molested, or even stalked and ogled as a result of his despicable activities is one too many.

{"commentId":915472,"threadId":"132735","contentId":"872573","authorDomain":"tombombadil"}
  • 2 votes
Reply#1 - Wed Aug 1, 2007 11:52 PM EDT
{"commentId":915477,"authorDomain":"tombombadil"}

This is an interesting and relevant current discussion topic on Newsvine ...

The Problem with NBC's "To Catch a Predator"

Personally, I'd love to see Chris Hansen get on this story about McClellen - predators like McClellen and his ilk need to be stopped ... cold.

{"commentId":915477,"threadId":"132735","contentId":"872573","authorDomain":"tombombadil"}
  • 1 vote
Reply#2 - Wed Aug 1, 2007 11:54 PM EDT
{"commentId":916684,"authorDomain":"sisterwarrior"}

Be careful, Tom: while I am equally repulsed by this person--don't tell me 'he's really a nice guy'--and fear for the safety of young girls, our laws are such that until he crosses that line he is innocent of legal wrong-doing. I know that's skewed, but that's the way it is. Going further to discuss 'what should be done to this guy' is teetering way close to criminalizing thought. Then we'd have to commission the Thought Police.

I submit that this IS unquestionably thought crimes; planning what to do and how to do it will invariably lead to when to do it. But so far we have freedom in this country, and that includes freedom of thought. 'Big Brother' has been held off; criminalizing thoughts such as these will lead us where we don't want to go.

The truth is, and the article states this, he is an anomaly, in that most predators hide in the shadows. That means there are hundreds more thinking this very same way. What McClellen has done is distinguish himself in a way that allows the legal system to monitor him and his thoughts as a shield of protection. And being online is traceable, so when he moves they'll know that, too. I think we need to be equally--if not more--worried about the ones who are still shadows. I hope there is a way to monitor everyone who visits his site.

{"commentId":916684,"threadId":"132735","contentId":"872573","authorDomain":"sisterwarrior"}
  • 2 votes
Reply#3 - Thu Aug 2, 2007 12:16 PM EDT
{"commentId":918169,"authorDomain":"tombombadil"}
I think we need to be equally--if not more--worried about the ones who are still shadows. I hope there is a way to monitor everyone who visits his site.

Excellent thoughts, and I agree with your note.

My concern is when a site is telling you how you can engage in criminal behavior - ala the North American Man-Boy Love Association (NAMBLA) - where is that legal line?

I can tell you if I ever saw McClellen or his ilk stalking my daughter or a group of young girls, he would be praying for the police to get to him first.

{"commentId":918169,"threadId":"132735","contentId":"872573","authorDomain":"tombombadil"}
  • 2 votes
#3.1 - Thu Aug 2, 2007 9:33 PM EDT
{"commentId":918844,"authorDomain":"sisterwarrior"}
he would be praying for the police to get to him first.

I do agree, Tom. And there is reason to be concerned about specific web sites. But what about the sites that teach you how to build a nuclear bomb? Or how to make meth in your own kitchen? Or the numerous books that detail how to commit the perfect murder?

It seems to me it's still freedom of speech. Talking about it, and thinking about it, aren't criminal. Planning it is criminal, thus the necessity of keeping a close eye on things.

{"commentId":918844,"threadId":"132735","contentId":"872573","authorDomain":"sisterwarrior"}
  • 2 votes
#3.2 - Fri Aug 3, 2007 7:48 AM EDT
{"commentId":921607,"authorDomain":"tombombadil"}

Agreed.

By the way, I saw in passing today that this McClellen perv has been ordered to stay away from children by a judge.

{"commentId":921607,"threadId":"132735","contentId":"872573","authorDomain":"tombombadil"}
  • 2 votes
#3.3 - Sat Aug 4, 2007 1:41 AM EDT
Reply
{"canLink":false,"threadId":"132735","isPrivate":false}
Leave a Comment:
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
{"threadId":"132735","contentId":"872573"}
Start TrackingStart Tracking
Stop TrackingStop Tracking